Love Letter is a game of deduction and betrayal. With a little luck and a little strategy you will win the favour of the Princess. Use your advantages to get your letter to her. Use your power to eliminate your rivals.
Each player starts with 1 card. On their turn they draw a 2nd card then choose which one to play, taking the action on that card if they can.
A game for 2 to 4 players, more is better if you like a bit more intrigue and deduction but a 2 player game is perfectly acceptable and fun. In a 3 or 4 player game you burn 1 card. In a 2 player game you burn 4 cards. So there is always the chance that the best card is out of the game. And sometimes the highest scoring card is a weakness.
Simple to learn, fun to play, quick and easy but never the same.
Definitely one for those who like something to carry with them when they travel. We’ve played it on the table at home with 4, and 2 of us have played on the little side table between the seats in the airport.
There’s a number of themed editions available. We have the original Tempest Edition.
I was so excited about this book, and the potential for the rest of the series.
It sounded like just my thing – my ideal mix of mystery and fantasy and little bit of ridiculousness thrown in.
Sadly, it didn’t hold my attention the way I thought it would. I read it and was a little disappointed.
I haven’t gone on to read the rest of the series yet. I’ll consider it down the track.
I wondered if I shouldn’t have posted something a bit more positive for my first review. But, hey, I was just being honest.
Still, I wouldn’t want you think I’m totally negative, so here’s one that I actually did enjoy.
My first Simon Brett novel. I’ll be back for more.
A nice, light English murder mystery that doesn’t pretend to be anything else. The solution was unexpected without being unbelievable.
My biggest complaint was the loose ends that were irrelevant or unimportant were tied up, but they didn’t need to be. It could have been finished a few pages sooner without losing anything. And the American spelling. Surely an English novel should have English spelling, even for an American audience. Sigh!
Life has been getting in the way of my reading so I haven’t been doing as much as I‘d like. And I’m a slow reader – always have been. But since I’m making an effort to find time I thought I’d start reviewing some of the ones I’m reading.
What can I say about this one? Dreadful.
Although this is the 9th in the series, it was the first Ann Ripley book I’ve read. And the last.
The writing itself is riddled with mistakes of grammar and syntax, but the most galling thing for me was the discrepancies in the timeline. From the very beginning, sections were given dates. The first was a party on 4th August. The next date was 18th August. But in between was reference to that same party “3 weeks ago”. You don’t have to be a prize winning mathematician to work out that’s wrong.
So I was off-side almost from the beginning.
Then there was the murder itself. The whole plot relied on you having read a previous book. I hadn’t. Although I’d have liked to start at the beginning of the series, our small library won’t necessarily have them all so sometimes we have to settle for what we can get. Recurring characters are one thing, but relying on information not available to a first time reader is unacceptable. Each book should stand alone.
Despite this, I easily worked out who the murderer was. I couldn’t figure out the motive … because I didn’t know the history.
I soon got bored with the bumbling attempts of the amateurs to solve the mystery and flicked to the end to check if I was right and find the “why”.
My assessment: Tedious and poorly written. Don’t bother.